ACWR for CrossFit: train the rate of change, not just the volume
What the research says
Tim Gabbett's work reframed the "more training causes injury" assumption. High chronic workloads, built gradually, are actually protective — well-trained athletes tolerate hard sessions. What predicts injury is the spike: acute load jumping well above what the body has adapted to. The relationship is U-shaped, so undertraining is also a risk because it leaves the athlete underprepared for the demands they eventually face.
Each session's load is quantified — by heart-rate-based TRIMP when HR is logged, or RPE × duration otherwise — then aggregated into acute (7-day) and chronic (28-day) windows. The ratio tells you whether this week is a sensible progression or a gamble.
How Dawg & Rabbit Fitness applies it
The app computes your ACWR continuously from logged sessions and keeps week-to-week progressions inside the safe band, deloading automatically when form (TSB) drops too far or monotony climbs. You see the live ratio, color-coded, with the threshold logic and Gabbett citation attached — so the load math is structural, not narrative.
Gabbett (2016). The training–injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(5), 273–280. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788
Related: how to taper for the Open · polarized 80/20 training · CrossFit pacing strategy